Skip to content

Social Media Loafing: The Feedback We’re Missing

  • Adrian Reed 
  • 5 min read

When I was studying as an undergraduate, sociology and psychology fascinated me. Even though they were somewhat peripheral to my main area of study, the way that people behave (individually and in groups) has always interested me.

I remember coming across a term social loafing which describes the tendency for individuals to put in less effort (on average) if they are part of a group, compared with if they undertook the same task individually. I was reminded recently that thereโ€™s a tangential and conceptual similarity between this and the bystander effect, where individuals are less likely to intervene in a situation if other people are present. For example, if someone collapses and only one person is present, that person will almost certainly call the emergency services. If there are ten people around, each person might assume โ€œsomebody elseโ€ has made the call.

I was thinking about these concepts recently having very briefly logged into Facebook (a social media network that, in my view, is about 15 years past its usefulness). I made the mistake of looking into a local neighbourhood group. I can almost hear the collective sigh of people reading thisโ€”if youโ€™ve ever been part of a neighbourhood FB group youโ€™ll know whatโ€™s comingโ€ฆ

While social media has the potential to bring people together and share information (and it does fulfil that, at least to an extent), the group I happened to briefly scroll through seemed to be largely filled with people โ€œshamingโ€ people who park in a particular way, and complaining about things like the refuse collectors missing their individual bin during the weekly collection.

A street, with a refuse collection van. All bins (trash cans) have been emptied except one. There are social media bubbles and emojis superimposed above the unemptied bin)
Image credit: AI Generated

What always fascinates me is how many people jump on to those threads, talking about the time their bin wasnโ€™t collected once seventeen years ago, turning them into a metaphorical โ€˜pity partyโ€™, relentlessly reciting everything thatโ€™s wrong with the city. Yet nobody actually reports it. Nobody makes the actual intervention that would solve the immediate problem.

The irony being that the city I live in actually has a reasonably easy to use mechanism for reporting things like missed bin collections. Which leads to the question, why arenโ€™t people using it?

Social Media Loafing

In my view, we seem to live in a world where sharing a meme, hitting share, or writing โ€œhopes and prayersโ€ on a social media update is a substitute for actual action. Perhaps people think that by contributing to a thread on a neighbourhood forum they are raising awareness of the issueโ€ฆ and they may be right. Certainly local elected members (councillors) are active on social media. However, personally, Iโ€™d rather they were focusing on the strategic policy-making issues at hand, rather than acting as a โ€˜forwarding mailboxโ€™ for enquiries about refuse collection. In fairness, I fully understand why they do what they doโ€ฆ after all, visibility and popularity win at the ballot box. Long-term policy-making is less visibleโ€ฆ but I digress.

The point here is that people may legitimately think theyโ€™ve taken action by posting something on social media and might, reasonably or unreasonably, expect that issue to be resolved. They might (rightly or wrongly) feel theyโ€™ve done what they need to do by posting on a Facebook group. 

Unless we conclude that they are there just to have a whine (or, as weโ€™d say in Pompey โ€˜to have a good squinnyโ€™), then surely they are aiming to make a change? Surely they are trying to get their issue resolved? If so, what does this mean for those of us that design services and processes?

Build Services and Processes that Listen

Whether weโ€™re involved in designing an end-to-end service, or a process that contributes to a service, itโ€™s worth considering how that service or process (and the people who orchestrate it) listens to its environment. This involves listening to what people are saying about the service, or absence thereof, on all sorts of channels.

For example, one might argue that if people are complaining on Facebook about a missed bin collection, there are several possible hypotheses to consider:

  • They might not know a โ€˜report itโ€™ option is available. So is there a communication gap?
  • Or, perhaps theyโ€™ve used it and it’s too difficult. Is there a usability or inclusion issue?
  • Maybe there are some people who are โ€˜social media nativesโ€™ and want a way to message on social media, rather than log in to a portal. Is that something thatโ€™s technically and socially feasible? Perhaps it should be researched and considered.
  • If thereโ€™s a pattern of missed (individual bin) collections, then perhaps thatโ€™s something that needs investigating and addressing.
  • Etcโ€ฆ

And yes, yes, there is also a possibility theyโ€™re just having a squinny. But we canโ€™t assume everyone is a complete dinny squin-bag, can we? And even if they are just having a moan, if the underlying complaint is valid, then itโ€™s an opportunity to look at how the service could be improved.

Feedback is Everywhere

We often think of feedback as being something formal thatโ€™s submitted via an official channel. Yet the reality is, if you look for it, feedback is everywhere. People using (or not using) a service is feedback. People getting to the last page of a digital journey and abandoning is feedback. And yes, people complaining on social media rather than contacting your organisation is feedback. The key is to build processes that listen to it and can adapt accordingly.

So the question is: Does your organisation genuinely monitor for, and hear, feedback? And if not, whose voices and perspectives are being missed?


What are your views? Please add a comment below, and letโ€™s keep the conversation flowing!

If youโ€™ve enjoyed this articleย donโ€™t forget to follow me on LinkedIn and check out BA Digest, the quarterly BA magazine.


About the author:

Adrian Reed is Principal Consultant at Blackmetric Business Solutions, an organisation that offers Business Analysis consulting and training solutions. Adrian is a keen advocate of the analysis profession, and is constantly looking for ways of promoting the value that good analysis can bring.

To find out more about the training and consulting services offered at Blackmetric, please visit www.blackmetric.com

Blackmetric: Logo. Word "Blackmetric" with a ruler beneath it

ยฉ Blackmetric Business Solutions, published exclusively on www.adrianreed.co.uk. May not be republished on any other site without permission.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.